Image retrieved December 11, 2011 from http://www.ride.ri.gov/Division-EEIE/images/CC-RSG_LOGO.gif
I just returned from the national Learning Forward conference where I attended a session with the goal of teaching participants how to use a collaborative tool designed to assess and advance the implementation of the Common Core Standards within a system. As the Common Core Standards continue to be implemented nationwide and as national assessments are beginning to be developed in collaboration with the Partnership for the Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC), the message both facilitators echoed was ….“teach the standards well” (David Hill and Patti Bridwell).
In their message, Bridwell and Hill focused on the two facets of organizational change – people and structures. Noting that people are not easily changed, the duo walked participants through a tool that will guide leaders to modify structures that affect attitudes, behavior, self-image, people, and actions.
The “tool” (scroll down to Common Core subheading and if the hyperlink does not take you in automatically, use the username and password “coach”) is a pilot version that consists of 5 components...
- 4 Levers (to help “lift” the heavy load of information and process)
- Key Indicators (to give stakeholders the “why” behind the change)
- Descriptors of Advanced Implementation (to guide the “how” of the process)
- Evidence of Current Practice (to determine what is actually in place)
- Recommendations (how can we use those current practices differently to affect change in the system at all levels within our control, aligned to the key indicator?)
Implementation suggestions included the following:
- Make sure you have a representative group of no more than 35.
- Model the use of the tool using key indicator 1.1; however do not complete the recommendation section at this time.
- Assign each table group two key indicators to complete.
- Facilitate a 'graffiti walk' so others have the opportunity provide evidence of current practice on additional key indicators.
- After the graffiti walk, ask the original group to consider all the evidence and generate recommendations for each of the key indicators.
- On a follow-up day, assemble a small subset of key leaders to consider and prioritize the recommendations. (Bridwell and Hill)
For more information regarding the Dana Center, Learning Forward members may access the following site – www.utdanacenter.org/pd/ila2010 – user name: coaches / password: coaches
Facilitators:
Patti Bridwell, The University of Texas, Charles A. Dana Center, Austin, TX
David Hill, The University of Texas, Charles A. Dana Center, Austin,